Trump – Hillary: America’s Historic Choice between Peace and War, between its Updating and Fall with a Bang By Dr. Leo Semashko

Dr Leo Semashko

Dr Leo Semashko

Leo M. Semashko, Ph.D. (Philosophy)

  • State Councilor of St. Petersburg, Russia.
  • Founding President, Global Harmony Association (GHA) since 2005.
  • Honorary President, GHA since 2016.
  • Director: Tetrasociology Public Institute, Russia.
  • Philosopher, Sociologist and Peacemaker from Harmony.
  • Author of more than 400 scientific publications, including 18 books in 1-12 languages.
  • Author of Tetrism as the unity of Tetraphilosophy and Tetrasociology – science of social harmony, global peace and harmonious civilisation.
  • Director, GHA Web portal “Peace from Harmony”.
  • Initiator, Manager, Coauthor and Editor in Chief of the book project “Global Peace Science” (GPS).
  1. The Election True Intrigue

Many people think and write that America now faces the ordinary choice of two evils (Trump – Hillary) – smaller. In fact, the scale of this election is a unique and unparalleled, infinitely more significant for the history of both the American and human history as a whole, incomparable with all previous presidential elections. Therefore, this choice is the historical from all points of view and in a holistic dimension fate of Western civilization. We will try to illustrate this in our article up to this choice and regardless of its final, although we foresee only one: Trump’s victory as the best for the US history and for the world at large. But stochastic reality can turn the other party.

Relationship to global peace is an essence of the presidential election campaign and a key criterion for evaluating any political leader of any country, especially such as the US – a global military empire. It is the election nerve but it is persistently hushed up and ignored by militaristic media, which masks its profitable fabrication of falsehoods and a war of compromising materials. The choice between peace and war, between the peacefulness and militarism is the true, deep intrigue of the presidential election, which is unacceptable to the ruling class of 1%, so it tries to bury it in a landfill lie, shows and an infinite number of ten-level details. No one even suggested it hypothesis, remaining at its shallow and muddy surface of sleaze war. No one has separated its wheat from its chaff and husk.

Trump’s slogan is: Make America Great Again” in peace rejects Hillary Clinton’s militarist slogan: “America has been and remains the great” imperial and militaristic power on the planet. The center of her slogan is strength (= militarism) in the manipulation form: “We Are Stronger Together”. Center Trump’s slogan is peace. Trump is the American people peacefulness and Hillary is militarism of the US ruling elite (1%), which created a “totalitarian democracy”. [1] Greatness of America is the common denominator of both candidates but its interpretation at them is radically different, as the radically different are war and peace, death and life, militarism and peacefulness. At Hilary peace is a sign of weakness and lack of greatness. At Trump peace is a sign of strength, dignity and greatness of the people.

  1. Trump’s Peacefulness

Trump has consistently expressed peacemaking intentions ‘to save humanity’: “shake rust off America’s foreign policy’, ‘have a coherent (balanced, harmonious – L.S.) foreign policy’, to withdraw the NATO troops from the western border of Russia, “to update the NATO outdated mission”, to stop supporting of ISIL that the US created [2 ], to establish a dialogue with Russia and China to hold Summit with them and organize cooperation in the fight against terrorism, to maintain Russia’s military operation in Syria, and so on. The cardinal change in foreign policy he defines as “replace randomness with purpose … chaos with peace” [3]. These are the Trump key peacemaking proposals, which, indeed, guarantee the salvation of humanity from wars, especially from nuclear war. (Trump understands that in the militarist system he cannot fully articulate his peace intentions and reveal all cards on this account that he would make after his victory). They clearly show that Trump is on the trail of peace and he is not going to go out with it to the warpath. The unbiased observers see it well, so they call to vote for Trump. For example, the Polish professor Julian Korab-Karpowicz wrote: “Donald Trump stands for triumph of America’s greatness and peace. He wants a strong America that serves World Peace, and not spreading continuous wars. He has condemned the “military adventures” USA in other countries that… Also, he wants to improve America’s corrupted political system. Vote for Trump, vote for peace!”[4]. (At Hillary we do not find Even a hint of anything like that – see below.)

Although Trump has no the necessary education and training in peacemaking but he has a brilliant intuition of peace. Therefore he feels deeply a peace-loving nature of humanity and his nation.  The universal and eternal harmonious classes SPHERONS of population constitutes this nature. From them come the eternal emanation, universal energy and powerful influence of peace from their harmony, hitherto unknown to science but available to the intuition of geniuses and the peoples. Their discovery and rational explanation appeared only recently in an unprecedented Global Peace Science [5; 5a]. The examples of brilliant peace intuition in the history of different civilizations were considered in this science by many authors of them. Trump expresses and embodies the peacefulness of the American people, its SPHERONS. Therefore, its organic peacefulness, undermining state militarism of the private ruling class (PARTON) of billionaires (1%) is the main source of hatred for him all militaristic imperial system. This is the main reason for his total demonization in the mainstream media under the patronage of the Democratic Party of war and its fostered candidate Hillary Clinton.

  1. Hillary’s Militarism

The Trump’s key peacemaking ideas are persistently violated and falsified as “foreign influence” (as if in the US the idea of peace died completely) by Hillary and the entire ruling militarist elite (1%), because they undermine its militarism as the source of its wealth, authority and might.  Here it is a root of confrontation and historical choice of the presidential election. Unlike Trump, we do not find at Hillary any peace statement, any one peace idea. The place of peacefulness is supplanted at her with Russophobia hysteria, lies and militaristic propaganda.

Therefore it is not Trump but Hillary has become an acute problem of the USA. According to Michael Moore: “Our biggest problem here isn’t Trump – it’s Hillary. She is hugely unpopular — nearly 70% of all voters think she is untrustworthy and dishonest. She represents the old way of politics, not really believing in anything other than what can get you elected. … She’s a hawk… Her vote for the Iraq War made me promise her that I would never vote for her again “[6].

The Swedish scientist Jan Oberg says: “Hillary Clinton is the last true hawk left in the race. I can only hope that I am wrong but I fear that Hillary Clinton – if she becomes the next President of the United States – is likely to be yet another militarist disaster for the world. (Another after) Obama, the US president who has been engaged in warfare during more days than any other US President”. Hillary is product of “the Military-Industrial-Media-Academic Complex (MIMAC); the cancer in many societies”.[7]

Hillary’s universal militarism was generated by its organic origin environment: militarism of the ruling unchangeable (eternal) top – a handful of the richest people in America, billionaires making up with its entourage, only about 1% of the population. This is the most powerful private class (PARTON) of America. It determines who will be the country president paying for the entire campaign. (Genesis of Trump is more modest: from the middle class, so it is closer to the people). Paul Craig Roberts says about Hilary’s affiliation: she is the obedient puppet of 1%: “Hillary represents the One Percent, as the Clinton’s $153,000,000 in speaking fees attest, but the 99 percent are self-destructing by voting in support of Hillary’s ambition to gain the presidency. Apparently, H.L. Mencken was correct, the vast majority of Americans are morons” [8]. Of course, the people is not an moron. It is just zombified by the official media manipulations. Trump does not show obedience and predictability for militarism, so it is very dangerous for 1%. Hilary, on the other hand, is completely obedient and predictable in its inflexible militarism, in its fanaticism, so she is the best candidate of the 1%. So, who call to vote for her, he urges vote for militarism and the continuation of the endless US wars.

The presidential candidate of the Green Party – Jill Stein, indicating its discrimination in the election campaign by the Democrats and their candidate Hillary Clinton, has repeatedly stressed the militaristic threat to nation from her part. In an interview, Stein said that America “could be in a nuclear war with Russia thanks to Hillary’s foreign policies” via six months after her victory  [9]. It should be noted that Jill Stein, with its peacebuilding program is the best presidential candidate in terms of global peace. But the militaristic US electoral system suppresses these candidates, even “own” Democrat Bernie Sanders, opening wide free road only for militarists, like Hillary [9].

John Avery of Denmark, Nobel Peace Prize Laureate, lists the “most dangerous” militaristic characteristics Hillary: “her known involvement in US wars, and her support for the present provocation of Russia, which might easily escalate into a catastrophic thermonuclear war…. close ties with Wall Street (1% – L.S.) and the Israel Lobby, and her failure to propose cuts in the obscenely bloated Pentagon budget” [10].  They create its brilliant portrait of the “true hawk and militarist misery of the world” in Jan Oberg’s opinion [above 7]. But this does not prevent the peacemaker Avery say that “nevertheless, Tramp would be even worse.” In what is it exactly? This is the beginning “scientific” demonization of Trump by the great traditional peacemakers, which continues and coincides with its demonization by Hillary and mainstream media.

  1. Demonization of Trump

What could be worse than nuclear war??? In my opinion – is NOTHING!!! But Avery here follows another peacemaking authority – Noam Chomsky, who advises the voters to “Hold your nose and vote for Hillary,” as if Hillary would be the greatest peacemaker. But this is a complete mishmash in the minds of pacifists, who have lost peacemaking guidance in their methodology impotent before the wars. Avery writes: “As Professor Chomsky points out, his (Trump – L.S.) most dangerous feature is his denial of climate change, and his proposal to scrap the Paris agreement. Climate change is an even more severe threat to the long-term future of human civilization and the biosphere than nuclear war.“[Ibid] Avery, in this case, contradicts himself when he immediately after the Paris Agreement, wrote: “We need a system change, not climate change!” [11] That disavows his and Chomsky. Avery allows himself to deny climate change for the sake of system changes (this is the absolute truth!). But do not let this Trump! Where here is the scientific logic??? Climate change and other global challenges are the secondary from the problem of peacefulness/militarism and depend from it primarily.

 I do not understand here the great peacemakers: Avery as scientist-chemist and Chomsky scientist-linguist, whom I appreciate for their profound critique of militarism, especially of the USA. They’re my friends in peacemaking but it is also different. Therefore here, “Plato is my friend, but truth is more expensive.” The truth is in the following. If we know that within one hour of a nuclear war, each side will destroy all life on Earth many times and plunges it into a “nuclear winter”, then what about the future of human civilization and what kind of climate change can be said when they will be simply destroyed at 100%??? This is an obvious logical inconsistency in the reasoning of my friends-scientists that I cannot recognize. It is contrary to reason, logic and scientific facts / experiments. What is the cause of this “scientific” demonization of Trump from pacifists, who, for the trees of his private, real and imagined shortcomings, do not see his peacemaking forest and his peaceful essence? We answer this question below.

The worse than Hillary’s nuclear war, which comes 6 months after her election by Stein, at Avery are “the serious flaws in Donald Trump’s character“, created for the most part by mainstream media, which bought democratic Washington elite and are under its heel with the current president. What kind of character flows are in question: “a vulgar misogynist, and a racist bigot, he is a neofascist who appeals to the lowest and most violent instincts of voters. He is also a poorly informed egomaniac who is unable to recognize his own limitations.” [Ibid] Avery uncritically repeats the demonized image of Trump, created by propaganda fabrication of forgeries of Washington under the auspices of “Nobel warlord Obama” [12].

Maybe this paid mythology is ‘even worse’ than nuclear war of Hillary within 6 months?? Of course, some careless attacks of Trump give some reason for such accusations, but he was always apologizing for them and denies them. The biggest, rough and unforgivable mistake of his peacemaking ignorance is his racial judgments about Latinos. The price of this mistake is the loss of about 30 million votes. But this is only a small fraction of the US population. Unlike Hillary’s militarism with nuclear war that threatens virtually the entire population not only America, but the world in general, Trump’s racist error, not having any excuses, threatens only a small part of the population. But it may turn out for him with the election’s defeat. Even taking into account Trump’s racist mistake, it is not clear: as his propaganda doll could become for peacemaker Avery more dangerous than a real nuclear war?? We will answer this question below.

Of course, Trump is not ideal. And who among people is the ideal? But he was not a warmonger, like Hilary and he is peacemaker unlike her. These are his highest two advantages over Hillary, which make his the most deserving for the US presidency.

As for the vulgar, dirty and low demonization of Trump in the liberal mainstream media, we will not delve into its cloaca and scandals. This item is not science and psychiatry. [13]

  1. Hillary’s militarism opens the way to fascism and Trump’s peacefulness closes it

Avery rightly concerned about the growth of fascism and militarism: “The drift towards militarism and fascism which we can observe today, not only in the United States but also in several other countries, is worryingly reminiscent of the 1930’s.” [10]. But this shift is characterized, above all, for the USA, in which uncontrolled growth of militarism leads to a fascist society and state, as in Nazi Germany, as many authors have written and that is confirmed by a number of fundamental facts. The more militarism is the more fascism and genocide.

Mairead Maguire, Nobel Peace Laureate, says about the NATO’s fascist tendency of continuous wars: “US and UK committed genocide against the Iraqi people when, between 1990 and 2012, they killed 3.3 million people — including 750,000 children. … NATO should be abolished … through non-violent action and civil resistance.”[14]. Hillary Clinton has a direct relation to this genocide (as well as to the ISIS creation), because she was secretary of state in the Obama administration since 2009. She is responsible, as a war criminal, for the blood of millions of innocent victims, including hundreds of thousands of children in Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan, Syria, etc.

Other facts of US and Clinton militarism: 1. NATO’s eastward expansion and deployment of its military infrastructure, including nuclear, on the border with Russia, which is similar to the concentration of Hitler’s Nazi troops on this border in 1941. 2. The decision of the Obama administration to fund an additional $ 1 trillion for the modernization of US nuclear weapons. 3. Traditional, since the Hiroshima / Nagasaki 1945, the US policy, which allows the first use of nuclear weapons. Hillary Clinton is knight of the fundamental trends of American militarism. She not dropped a single word against them, without saying a single word in defense of world peace.

Donald Trump, as shown above, largely limits militarism, which elected him a prime target in the most powerful governmental campaign to discredit him, led by the current president. Trump, unlike Hillary, is not tainted by the facts of genocide, war crimes against humanity and fascist society. In this regard, it is permissible to ask Avery, on what basis he accuses Trump in fascism and dismiss Hillary from these charges. Avery no gives any one such fact for Trump, but stubbornly silent about these facts at Hilary. As it is combined with Avery’s noble calling “to destroy the institution of war“? Who is capable and ready for it – Trump or Hillary, who follows the example of Hitler? Hilary has no thoughts, even hint at it: she is a fanatical militarist, “true hawk” on Oberg. Trump, on the contrary, offers at least to cut militarism, making US foreign policy “coherent” and to clear it from the military rust.

By Hillary’s hands and her fellows Democrats was strengthen militarism, in the words of William Blum, “rogue state” [15] with the “deadliest export of democracy” [16]. She is, by definition of Diana Johnstone, – “Queen of Chaos” [17] with its global “totalitarian democracy” by William Engdahl [18], or with the “inverted totalitarianism” by Sheldon Wolin [19], with its “globalization of war against humanity” by Michel Chossudovsky [19a], with its “fascism” by Garry Brumback [20], with its “state terrorism” by Noam Chomsky [21], with its “addicted to war” by Frank Dorrel [21a], with its help to the jihadists by Alastair Crooke [22], with its “war crimes against humanity” [23] and the direct link with “nuclear war” by Joachim Hagopian [24], using terrorism as “ultimate weapon of the global elite” by Robert Burrowes [25] and so on without end. Hilary has created ISIS terrorism and fed from it, receiving donations from Al Qaeda for Clinton’s Foundation as Michel Chossudovsky proves and other [26; 26a]. This Clinton Family Foundation received from Wayne Madsen precise definition of “Bonnie and Clyde” – famous American robbers of the Great Depression time [27]. Hilary is the type empire craving U.S. politician that willingly violates the US Constitution as well as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, similar to the pattern followed by George W. Bush and Obama, in the opinion of Theodore McIntire [28].

Critically and integrally valuable for the USA fate is a brilliant scientific conclusion of Canadian professor Henry Giroux: “You can’t have a democracy that organizes itself around war.” [29]. It is about Hillary. She, organizing the American life around war, eliminates democracy and opens the door to fascism. But are Americans and true peacemakers wanting fascism every from Democrats?

Hillary’s consciousness is extremely dangerous for world peace of her fanatical and totalitarian militarism. It requires a Copernican revolution, which GHA offered in the project “Russia-USA-Peace” (RUSAP) signed by 42 coauthors (including 3 Nobel Peace Laureates) from 21 countries [30]. We doubt that she will be capable to similar revolution of thinking and its transition from war to peace. But we have no doubt that Trump will be able to such a revolution. In fact, he had already started it in his presidential campaign. From this revolution of consciousness of the USA future president will be depend the fate of global peace in the next 4 years.

  1. Peacemaking ignorance of Trump is much better militaristic professionalism of Hillary

The debate of the presidential candidates, like every show or horse racing, has a low cultural and intellectual level. In speeches of them none sounded the names of genius peacemakers: Kant, Tolstoy, Gandhi, Einstein, King and many other immortal thinkers. The most aggressive Hillary banished from his vocabulary the concepts of peace and culture, at the mention of that the fascist bosses, as we know, reaching for a gun. They are the Trump’s key peacemaking proposals, which are trampled by Hillary. Why Avery did not see them? Or he does not want to see them?

As regards preparedness, yes, Trump yields to Hilary in professionalism. But in what kind of professionalism is it? And what is best for America and the world? Certainly, peacemaking ignorance of Trump ( ‘poorly informed egomaniac’), which concerns the racial issues and that he can eliminate his training after the victory, fundamentally better than militaristic professionalism Hillary that led to genocide in Iraq and Libya and can leading to a global genocide of nuclear war. Her professionalism is threatening to life of humanity and destruction of the country. Who needs it?? Only militarists, only 1% is. We cannot expect from Hillary the overturn of her mind from war to peace, without which there cannot be a Copernican revolution of the relations between the US and Russia to reduce the risk of nuclear war madness. On the contrary, consciousness of Trump, with all his ignorant gaps, which are easily disposable, is ready for this revolution of consciousness and relationships. He is configured to them.

We are not concerned with comparative analysis of the internal programs of candidates. But it is clear that the peace-loving foreign policy of the country will create a better environment for the successful solution of the national problems but militarism will be hinder their solution. For example, militarism hung on the country a huge state debt as a time bomb that eventually will lead the US to economic collapse. However, warmonger Hillary prefers to hold back this threat. Only peacefulness of Trump if he will pursue it consistently and on a scientific basis will liberate the country from the deadly yoke of governmental debt. Peacemaking thinking Trump is more scale and at more higher level than at Hilary, so it is able to solve the traditional problems and Hilary’s traditional militaristic thinking is not able to solve them, because, as Einstein said, “The significant problems we have cannot be solved at the same level of thinking we were at when we created them.” Therefore, militaristic professionalism of Hilary is a disaster for the country, and the peacefulness of Trump is to prevent it.

  1. Consequences and conclusions of winning Trump or Hillary

How Hillary is able to win in the presidential election? If for she will vote the majority of US voters, who have shown their zombie manipulation by mainstream media, supporting militarism of Hillary and Obama Democratic Party. Or maybe, as a result of electoral fraud with the vote count, about which said Trump. Anyway, it will be a victory of the “worst evil”, the victory of the war over peace.

If Hillary, “worst evil”, wins that awaits America and the world in the next 4 years?

  1. Growth of the global arms race, profitable for the US ruling militarist elite.
  2. Balancing the world on the brink of a global nuclear war in 30 seconds from catastrophe.
  3. Growth and spread of terrorism around the world, encouraged by the US militarist elite.
  4. Fall of the US militarist empire in 2020, with weeping or with a bang (it’s more) that Johan Galtung brilliantly predicted 20 years ago [31].

If Trump wins, what it would give for America and the world?

  1. Restriction of the arms race and the reduction of military tensions in the world.
  2. Withdrawal of NATO troops from the western borders of Russia and lowering nuclear confrontation.
  3. Global Peace Summit and the establishment of a permanent peace dialogue.
  4. Joint development of Global Peace Science as a common platform for “nuclear zero”.

Comparison of the effects of these victories is incomparably in significance. Obviously, no doubt, for 99% is preferably the consequences of Trump’s win! He gives America and the world hope for peace, and Hillary takes it away! There is nothing more to say.

How can we explain victory and defeat in these presidential findings in terms of Global Peace Science? For elusive endless stochasticity of struggle of the numerous private PARTONS (classes, parties, groups) on the perceived surface of presidential elections, in their depth are invariant spheral laws, laws of SPHERONS, the real strength of which in the United States will determine the elections result ultimately. This is the understanding of modern, unique and extraordinary presidential elections in the USA from the perspective of this science [5; 5a]

Trump’s win is a victory for the American people (99%) and its peaceful SPHERONS, winning of their peacemaking intuition and a breakthrough in the social consciousness of America, which begins its Copernican Revolution via Global Peace Science. This revolution of consciousness paves the way for the scientific reconstruction of the entire socio-political and economic system of the country to save it from imminent collapse with a bang, with the biggest misfortunes for the people. Trump’s victory would also mean a huge stock of its peacebuilding strength overlying his racist mistake. Trump’s movement along this path will enable him to realize his very ambitious dream: “To become the greatest President of America.” Of course, if he will avoid the sad fate of John F. Kennedy.

Hillary’s win is a victory the most powerful economic and political PARTON – irremovable ruling class of billionaires – 1% of the US population. This PARTON on his militaristic nature is constantly interested in endless war in opinion of Phyllis Bennis [32]. This is a victory of militarism, its military science and military consciousness over peace and peacebuilding consciousness.

Choose between Trump and Hillary is the choice of America between peace and war, between the update and the decline of America. The win of one of them is a victory or peace over war or war over peace. This is the scientific explanation of the USA presidential elections results in 2016.

This is also a scientific explanation for the impotence before war and militarism of the traditional peacemaking, which was not able to prevent wars of the last centuries. Pacifist peacemaking is devoid the solid, objective basis that does not allow it to rise to a scientific holistic level, while remaining within the subjective and fragmented ‘up to paranoia’ thinking. Therefore, it does not allow even the great peacemakers clearly understand who is who of the two candidates and make mistakes in their choices and their recommendations to voters that does not add credibility to them. Therefore, even the great peacemakers go on about the militaristic propaganda and lose the thread of peacemaking in the election husk, considering Trump’s peacefulness more danger than Hillary’s nuclear war. Of course, it is a gross error of traditional peacemakers with any result of the election. Correct it could only scientific understanding of these elections in the new peace science and one arising from it appeal:

Vote for Trump, vote for peace! Their victory is inevitable!

  • I think this article will be refused to publish in America and in militaristic media, and in traditional peacemaking. This is obvious from its innovative content.
Donald Trump & Hillary Clinton

Donald Trump & Hillary Clinton

References:

1. Engdahl, F. William (2009) Full Spectrum Dominance: Totalitarian Democracy in the New World Order: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=659

2. Engelhardt, Tom (2014) How America Made ISIS. http://www.commondreams.org/views/2014/09/02/how-america-made-isis

3. [Donald Trumps’s personal page]: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=685

4. Korab-Karpowicz, W. Julian (2016) Vote for Trump, Vote for Peace!- http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=724

5. Semashko, Leo and 173 coauthors from 34 countries (2016) Global Peace Science: http://peacefromharmony.org/docs/global-peace-science-2016.pdf 5а. Semashko, Leo. SPHERONS of Harmony: Copernican Revolution of Peacebuilding and Civilization: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=423

6. Moore, Michael (2016) 5 Reasons Why Trump Will Win: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=685

7. Oberg, Jan (2016) The Clintons Celebrated – But Likely Disastrous for the World : http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=703

8. Roberts, Paul Craig (2015) Americans: A Conquered People: The New Serfs. “Russia and China stand between Washington and Washington’s Goal of Hegemony over the Entire World”: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=657

9. [ Jill Stein’s personal page]: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=670

10. Avery, John Scales (2016) What U.S. Progressives Should Do on Nov. 8: https://www.transcend.org/tms/2016/10/what-u-s-progressives-should-do-on-nov-8/

11. Avery, John Scales (Dec. 21, 2015) Paris: We Need System Change! http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=672

12. Chossudovsky, Michel (2009) Obama and the Nobel Prize: When War becomes Peace, When the Lie becomes the Truth. Obama’s “War Without Borders.” http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=682

13. Engelhardt, Tom (2014) Shrinking the Empire: A Session on the Imperial Couch: http://www.commondreams.org/views/2014/11/11/shrinking-empire-session-imperial-couch

14. Maguire, Mairead (2014) The Disturbing Expansion of the Military-Industrial Complex: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=678

15. Blum, William (2005) Rogue State: http://williamblum.org/books/rogue-state

16. Blum, William (2013) America’s Deadliest Export: Democracy: http://williamblum.org/books/americas-deadliest-export

17. Johnstone, Diana (2015) Queen of Chaos. The misadventures of Hillary Clinton. CounterPunch: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=685

 18. Engdahl, F. William (2009) Full Spectrum Dominance: Totalitarian Democracy in the New World Order: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=659

19. Wolin, Sheldon (2003) Inverted Totalitarianism. How the Bush regime is effecting the transformation to a fascist-like state: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=721 19a. Chossudovsky, Michel (2016) The Globalization of War, America’s “Long War” against Humanity: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=682

20. Brumback, Gary (2016) Real America, an Endangering and Endangered Ruination. Real America is already a fascist state: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=675

21. Chomsky, Noam and Andre Vltchek (2013) On Western Terrorism: From Hiroshima to Drone Warfare: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=637
21a. Dorrel, Frank and Joel Andreas (2015) Addicted To War: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=668

22. Crooke, Alastair (2016) How the US Armed-up Syrian Jihadists: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=716

23. Hagopian, Joachim (2014) Historical Tradition of American Empire War and Genocidal Crimes Against Humanity: http://www.globalresearch.ca/historical-tradition-of-american-empire-war-and-genocidal-crimes-against-humanity/5393997

24. Hagopian, Joachim (2016) Neocon Insanity and “Political Madness”: Hillary Clinton and the Dangers of Nuclear War. The Elite’s Rush to Implant Hillary in Power: http://www.globalresearch.ca/neocon-insanity-and-political-madness-hillary-clinton-and-the-dangers-of-nuclear-war/5550172

25. Burrowes, Robert J. (2016) Terrorism: Ultimate Weapon of the Global Elite: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=645

26. Chozick, Amy and Steve Eder (2016) Foundation Ties Bedevil Hillary Clinton’s Presidential Campaign: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=707 26a. Chossudovsky, Michel (04/11/16) Al Qaeda will Vote for Hillary on November 8 ….Truth and Satire: Twelve Reasons Why Al Qaeda Supports Hillary Clinton: http://www.globalresearch.ca/al-qaeda-will-vote-for-hillary-on-november-8/5554736

27. Madsen, Wayne (2016) Hillary and Bill Clinton: The «Bonnie and Clyde» of American Politics http://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2016/11/03/hillary-bill-clinton-bonnie-and-clyde-american-politics.html

28. McIntire, Theodore (2016) 10 Simple Things Pentagon Generals Should Know But Apparently Don’t: http://russia-insider.com/en/politics/10-simple-things-pentagon-generals-should-know-apparently-dont/ri17067

29. Giroux, Henry A. (2016) Politics as Pathology in the Warfare State: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=636

30. Semashko, Leo and 42 coauthors from 21 countries (Sept. 2016): Russia-USA-Peace Project: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=710

31. Galtung, Johan (2009). The Fall of the US Empire – and Then What? http://www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=599

32. Bennis, Phyllis (2016) A Sanders Foreign-Policy Doctrine? How About ‘No Wars for the Billionaire Class? http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=667

.

QR Code for the post